优点胜利。
我们很高兴地注意到一直赋予的大规模和奉承的证词。Samuel Eastman＆Co.，N.H。，N.H。，N. H.是皮革软管的进取型制造商，受到了大约约克，宾夕法尼亚州的晚会宣布。它正好而是谦虚地为他们提供了合同对其合同的信誉，因为他们同意的那样。在这种情况下，如在所有情况下，Merit赢了。我们参考读取的文章如下：
"The last installment of hose—comprising eight hundred feet—has been received from the firm of Samuel Eastman & Co., of East Concord, N. H., which fills the order for 3200 feet, which was given to this firm by the Borough Council. The entire amount of hose received has been thoroughly and critically examined, and favorably reported upon by the committee of leather experts, appointed by the council. It has been subjected to a severe test by the Firemen—under directions of the Fire Committee—who expressed themselves perfectly satisfied. The hose has been accepted by the Council, and the bill for the full amount received, and ordered paid. When we say that the Borough has received from this firm the best line of hose the Department has ever had we but echo the opinion of leather experts, Firemen and citizens generally, who have been interested in the hose question, that has agitated the public mind for some time. The order for hose given to Eastman & Co. was the second one given to hose manufactures within the past three months. The first order was to the firm of Harrow & Turner, of New York, for 2400 feet to be made from the best oak tanned leather, and to withstand a water pressure of 180 pounds to the square inch. When the hose arrived it was examined by Messrs. Tracy, Rudy and Wecker, gentleman who have had years of experience in the manufacture of leather, and upon examination of the hose furnished by Harrow & Turner pronounced it to be made from an inferior quality of leather, rating it as second and third grade. Some of the links had patches on to cover weak spots, while nearly every link showed many d fects, one having upwards of forty. When the hose was tested its unfitness for fire duty was demonstrated when under pressure, varying from 40 to 160 pounds, section after section gave away until the entire 2400 feet was placed “ hors du combat.” Upon the report of the Committe of Tanners and the Fire Committee to the Council, the hose was rejected and ordered to be sent back to Harrow & Turner, whom we understand have instituted legal proceedings to compel the Borough to accept and pay for the condemned hose. If Harrow & Turner had fulfilled their agreement as well as Eastman & Co. did, there would be no need of resorting to law. ”
