橡胶轮胎固体与气动

橡胶轮胎固体与气动

我认为本文的目的是指汽车或机械推动的设备。并会为您提供我能够获得的信息,因为我自己的经验有限。根据我可以在与固体和气动的不同类型和风格的制造商和用户交谈时获得的所有信息,我得出的结论是,在某些条件和情况下,可优选固体轮胎,在其他条件下,气动轮胎建议。如果需要高速速度,则必须配备您的设备,配备气动轮胎,因为1 am告诉我们,每小时大约二十至二十五英里是速度的极限,除非有固体轮胎安全运行,否则街道没有沮丧和预测或高街道的街道;在这种情况下,可以安全地获得约30英里的速度。现在,关于气动轮胎,虽然您可以在各种道路或街道上每小时五十至六十英里的速度有限制,但每轮胎的里程仅为10到1500英里,直到由于这些设备的重量而言,它们显示出虚弱和吹出或赫斯特的迹象。然后,可以在气动轮胎上携带的重量限制。那个限制是我不准备陈述的,因为在他的轮胎和使用者中,他似乎还没有确定。 I have also been informed by reliable authority that an automobile hose wagon delivered to New York City was required to run thirty-five miles in an hour, and at the end of the run the tires were worn down to the iron rims. This run was made through sand the greater part of the distance, and this particular car was equipped with solid tires

In conversation with drivers of automobile fire apparatus, I am informed that the solid tires skid more than the pneumatic, as the adhesion to the street surface is not as great as the pneumatic, as the continual bound of the solid tires on roughly paved streets causes an additional tendency to skid. The expense incurred by the replacement of the pneumatic tires seems to be the greatest objection to them. Such being the case, I am informed, and I think truthfully, that the solid tires will cause an addition to the repair account, which in the end would about equal the cost of maintenance.

If you are a current subscriber,访问此内容。

If you would like to become a subscriber, please visit ushere.

No posts to display