重要案例决定对城市

重要案例决定对城市

东部泽西州水公司终于赢得了肯定赢得了,最后争取普通话百万美元拦截下水道的斗争,泽西河河谷需要抵御泽西市的污染供水。如果是建造的,下水道,泽西城市日记的作家都必须由泽西城市的人员支付。副校长史蒂文斯在驳回泽西市重新打开1910年制定的法令时,允许泽西市供水公司替代氯化工厂刚刚被肯定的是法庭错误和上诉。当泽西市从泽西市供水公司获得洛杉矶河谷的布恩顿水资源,这是东部泽西水公司,它规定了水公司回报了7,000,000美元的公司必须为该植物支付。提供充分的保障措施免受污染。校长委员会裁定,次氯异常治疗将提供此类保障措施,并安装系统。后来城市变得相信氯化厂不再适当,并决定必须建造拦截下水道,但是当它来决定谁是脚的账单时,东部泽西水的利益落在多年前的校政方面的决定落后法院对水的化学处理与拦截下水道有效的影响。Corporation Counsel Milton告诉市政当局,不能被迫支付该下水道的Fjast泽西。 This view was disputed and the City Commission engaged former Congressman Marshall Van Winkle to give a special opinion on thematter. Mr. Van Winkle finally decided that Mr. Milton was right and that the city would have to pay for the sewer. Still there were differences of opinion. In order to leave no opportunity for the charge that the city government was favoring the East Jersey, the City Commission decided to engage counsel to fight in the Court of Chancery for the reversal of the old Chancery Court decision that relieved the East Jersey of the duty of putting in an intercepting sewer. Thus far about $40,000 have been spent in counsel fees and expert fees in connection with this fight. The plans for the building; of the intercepting sewer are being held in abeyance in the City Hall in order to await the outcome of new litigation started by the East Jersey to prevent the building of the sewer, the company now claiming that the emptying of the effluent from that sewer into the Rockaway River below Boonton would damage the Passaic River water supply upon which the East Jersey depends. The Rockaway River empties into the Passaic River above the Little Falls pumping station of the East Jersey.

东部泽西州水公司终于赢得了肯定赢得了,最后争取普通话百万美元拦截下水道的斗争,泽西河河谷需要抵御泽西市的污染供水。如果是建造的,下水道,泽西城市日记的作家都必须由泽西城市的人员支付。副校长史蒂文斯在驳回泽西市重新打开1910年制定的法令时,允许泽西市供水公司替代氯化工厂刚刚被肯定的是法庭错误和上诉。当泽西市从泽西市供水公司获得洛杉矶河谷的布恩顿水资源,这是东部泽西水公司,它规定了水公司回报了7,000,000美元的公司必须为该植物支付。提供充分的保障措施免受污染。校长委员会裁定,次氯异常治疗将提供此类保障措施,并安装系统。后来城市变得相信氯化厂不再适当,并决定必须建造拦截下水道,但是当它来决定谁是脚的账单时,东部泽西水的利益落在多年前的校政方面的决定落后法院对水的化学处理与拦截下水道有效的影响。Corporation Counsel Milton告诉市政当局,不能被迫支付该下水道的Fjast泽西。 This view was disputed and the City Commission engaged former Congressman Marshall Van Winkle to give a special opinion on thematter. Mr. Van Winkle finally decided that Mr. Milton was right and that the city would have to pay for the sewer. Still there were differences of opinion. In order to leave no opportunity for the charge that the city government was favoring the East Jersey, the City Commission decided to engage counsel to fight in the Court of Chancery for the reversal of the old Chancery Court decision that relieved the East Jersey of the duty of putting in an intercepting sewer. Thus far about $40,000 have been spent in counsel fees and expert fees in connection with this fight. The plans for the building; of the intercepting sewer are being held in abeyance in the City Hall in order to await the outcome of new litigation started by the East Jersey to prevent the building of the sewer, the company now claiming that the emptying of the effluent from that sewer into the Rockaway River below Boonton would damage the Passaic River water supply upon which the East Jersey depends. The Rockaway River empties into the Passaic River above the Little Falls pumping station of the East Jersey.

如果您是当前的订户,访问此内容。

如果您想成为订户,请访问我们在这里

没有帖子显示