相对于众议院破坏的法律决定，以停止射击。
注意第四区美国巡回上诉法院的一项重要裁决，相对于房主对弗吉尼亚镇造成的侵犯行动的侵犯行动，他的房屋被摧毁，以阻止大火蔓延，is called by the West Publishing Company’s Docket, which says: “On October 29, 1910, a fire occurred in the town of Warrington, Va., and for the purpose of stopping the sptead of the fire a house was destroyed by the officers of the town. An action of trespass was brought by the owner against the town for $5,000 damages. The Virginia Code, Sections 1049 and 1067b, provides for the formation of volunteer fire companies. Section 1053 provides for the appointment of a principal engineer and fire wardens. Section 1060 declares that the principal engineer, or the warden commanding in his absence, may direct the pulling down or destruction of any house or other thing that he may judge necessary to prevent the further spreading of fire; and Section 1061 gives the owner of such property the right to recover the amount of the actual damage he may have sustained by reason of the same having been pulled down or destroyed under such direction. The United States Circuit Court of Appeals of the Fourth District in Page vs. Town of Warrington 210 Fed. held that it was a prerequisite to the authority of the town council under such act to appoint a principal engineer or fire warden; that there was an organized fire company within the town within such act; and hence where a declaration by a property owner to recover damages for the tearing down of his building alleged that the town, its officers and agents wrongfully blew up and tore down his building in order to stop a fire, but did not allege the existence of an organized fire company under the act in the town or show the appointment by the council of anyone with authority to act under Section 1060, it was fatally defective, the town being under no liability under the common law.”
注意第四区美国巡回上诉法院的一项重要裁决，相对于房主对弗吉尼亚镇造成的侵犯行动的侵犯行动，他的房屋被摧毁，以阻止大火蔓延，is called by the West Publishing Company’s Docket, which says: “On October 29, 1910, a fire occurred in the town of Warrington, Va., and for the purpose of stopping the sptead of the fire a house was destroyed by the officers of the town. An action of trespass was brought by the owner against the town for $5,000 damages. The Virginia Code, Sections 1049 and 1067b, provides for the formation of volunteer fire companies. Section 1053 provides for the appointment of a principal engineer and fire wardens. Section 1060 declares that the principal engineer, or the warden commanding in his absence, may direct the pulling down or destruction of any house or other thing that he may judge necessary to prevent the further spreading of fire; and Section 1061 gives the owner of such property the right to recover the amount of the actual damage he may have sustained by reason of the same having been pulled down or destroyed under such direction. The United States Circuit Court of Appeals of the Fourth District in Page vs. Town of Warrington 210 Fed. held that it was a prerequisite to the authority of the town council under such act to appoint a principal engineer or fire warden; that there was an organized fire company within the town within such act; and hence where a declaration by a property owner to recover damages for the tearing down of his building alleged that the town, its officers and agents wrongfully blew up and tore down his building in order to stop a fire, but did not allege the existence of an organized fire company under the act in the town or show the appointment by the council of anyone with authority to act under Section 1060, it was fatally defective, the town being under no liability under the common law.”
